Wednesday, October 7, 2009

The Clean Skies Alliance

The Clean Skies Alliance, a trade group that lobbies for more use of natural gas, has picked a lawyer who specializes in climate change as its new CEO.

The Clean Skies Alliance, closely affiliated with Chesapeake Energy, has lobbied against programs that would promote clean coal, and in favor of more natural gas exploration. The group has its own website, www.cleanskies.com and airs a weekly television program on a Washington, D.C., TV station.

Greg Staple, a former partner at the law firm Vinson & Elkins, before joining the Clean Skies Foundation as a policy analyst.

Read below the jump for the full press release.

Continue reading "" »

Much More Information About The Barnett Shale

Here is an excellent blog about the Barnett Shale. It contains a wealth of information and is created and maintained by the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

http://startelegram.typepad.com/barnett_shale/2009/10/another-shale-gas-play.html

Gas Everywhere

Another shale gas play

The Barnett Shale may be the granddaddy of shale gas plays -- this is where producers worked out the technology that made it feasible to recover natural gas from unconventional formations.

But there seem to be plenty of additions to the family. The Houston Chronicle reports on the latest find, the Eagle Ford shale in South Texas. Its advantages include lower production costs, easy terrain and a local population land owners who "have grown comfortable with the industry after decades of oil drilling," the Chron reports.

There are also some interesting numbers on the break-even cost for producers.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/energy/6653999.html

-- Mike Lee

Shale Gas Exploration And Development Goes International

It is no surprise to this geologist that the technology used to produce gas from the Fort Worth Basin and its Barnett Shale is finding its way to other parts of the world.

Shale, that often organic-rich, dark gray or black, very fine grained sedimentary rock, is found in every sedimentary basin, both present and ancient, on Earth. It is sometimes called "mud-rock" as is appropriate to its origin.

The organic matter in these shales can be converted into oil and natural gas as it is heated and buried by thousands of feet of additional sediments. The fact that these rocks contain a flammable gas (natural gas) has been known since antiquity. However, from an economic standpoint, shale has mostly just been considered a "source" rock for oil and gas found elsewhere. Times have changed.

Now shale can be considered a source, seal, trap, and reservoir of gas, (and sometimes oil) --- an all in one package. With the proper combination of horizontal drilling and rock fracturing technology these shales can produce very economic quantities of gas. This has been proven in the Barnett Shale in north Texas, and to a lesser, but growing extent elsewhere. Since shales of this nature are so prevalent around the world, it makes sense that the combination of horizontal drilling, the logging and steering of these wells while drilling, and the fracture treatment of the rocks is finding its way to countries outside of the United States.

Natural gas has many uses, from generating electricity, to heating our homes, cooking our food and powering our vehicles. It burns very cleanly and its only by-product is harmless water vapor and carbon dioxide. If it were not so clean, how could we use it in our homes to cook our food? Are you listening EPA?

If President Obama was really interested in stimulating the economy he would be promoting the production and more widespread use of natural gas. Maybe his advisers are just ignorant of the facts. It certainly makes far more sense to use inexpensive and ubiquitous natural gas than it does to spend Billions on solar panels and wind turbines, which can never do more than supply a fraction of our energy needs.

If anyone doubts the jobs, equipment and technology required to drill and produce gas from these shales, they should visit an active drill site, or witness a frac job. They should also consider that for every person working in the field, there are probably tens or hundreds of people working behind the scenes. It is a big and growing business. Browse this blog and you will find many, more relevant articles and information on this subject. Pass it around. Send it to your Congressman. Send it to Mr. Obama.

The following article from the "Fort Worth Star-Telegram" tells more of the story.
Peter




Star-Telegram.com

Barnett Shale seen as model for drillers worldwide


Posted Tuesday, Sep. 29, 2009 (source)





The search for unconventional natural gas deposits in areas like the Barnett Shale of North Texas not only is dominating gas drilling in the United States, but it will also become pervasive worldwide.

That was the message given Tuesday by two experts at the opening of a three-day energy conference in the Fort Worth Convention Center.

"I think unconventional gas is the future, both in the U.S. and overseas," said Vello Kuuskraa, president of Advanced Resources International, known for his work in energy economics and petroleum recovery technologies.

Unconventional gas includes shale gas, tight gas and coal-bed methane, deposits that require measures such as horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing to enhance their recovery and make them economically feasible.

Unconventional gas accounts for more than half of U.S. production, Kuuskraa said, even though what he called two new "rock stars" among shale fields — the Haynesville Shale in northwest Louisiana and East Texas, and the Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian region of the eastern United States — are just beginning to be significantly developed.

Meanwhile, Kuuskraa said he expects his end-of-the-year calculations to show that the Barnett Shale has become the biggest gas-producing area in the U.S., outstripping the San Juan Basin in New Mexico and Colorado.

The U.S. is leading the way in the search for unconventional gas, and developing the technology that will "be used around the world," said Stephen Holditch, head of the petroleum engineering department at Texas A&M University and former president of the Society of Petroleum Engineers-International.

Oil and gas exploration and production companies either based in North Texas or with substantial operations in the region are in the thick of the search for unconventional gas.

That includes three Fort Worth-based companies, XTO Energy, Range Resources and Quicksilver Resources; two Oklahoma City-based companies, Devon Energy and Chesapeake Energy, the top two Barnett Shale producers; and Irving-based Exxon Mobil Corp., which is drilling for unconventional gas everywhere from Colorado to Hungary.

Kuuskraa said Exxon Mobil is said to have gotten encouraging results from initial drilling in the Mako Trough in Hungary.

There are reportedly "massive concentrations" of gas — estimated at 700 billion cubic feet per square mile — in a small area of the Eastern European nation, he said.

Future unconventional gas recovery worldwide could significantly expand supplies, which would help make gas increasingly attractive as a fuel for transportation and electric power generation, Kuuskraa forecast at the Unconventional Gas International Conference & Exhibition, which resumes today.


JACK Z. SMITH, 817-390-7724


Wednesday, September 23, 2009

The Fightin' Side Of Me

More about natural gas, the economy, common sense, politics, the environment, the Obama Administration, and a little fun. The solution to America's energy, employment and national security is right under our feet, in our back yards. Wake up America.

Click on the link to the Merle Haggard song on youtube..
Peter

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0n552gP9X40

Who's Looking At Natural Gas Now? Big Oil

September 23, 2009

Custom image: Digging a shallow natural gas well in Clarksburg, W. Va.
Enlarge Tom Gjelten/NPR

Gastar Exploration, a small Texas company, is digging a shallow natural gas well in Clarksburg, W.Va. Gastar's business strategy is to limit its exploration and drilling to a minimum in the Appalachian region until it sees how larger gas companies fare in the area.

Custom image: Digging a shallow natural gas well in Clarksburg, W. Va.
Tom Gjelten/NPR

Gastar Exploration, a small Texas company, is digging a shallow natural gas well in Clarksburg, W.Va. Gastar's business strategy is to limit its exploration and drilling to a minimum in the Appalachian region until it sees how larger gas companies fare in the area.

In the energy world, Big Oil has long been the key player — with one notable exception: The natural gas business in the United States is dominated by small, independent companies. More than 80 percent of U.S. natural gas supplies are produced by companies with a market capitalization of less than $500 million. On average, these companies have only a dozen employees.

But their business is booming. New production techniques in recent years have enabled companies to extract natural gas from shale rock formations deep underground. As a result, estimates of accessible natural gas reserves have been revised dramatically upward. Small gas producers can justifiably take the credit for the transformation of their industry.

"The major oil companies haven't been paying attention to the U.S. for decades," says Robert Hefner, a 50-year veteran of the natural gas business with a company of his own, GHK Exploration, in Oklahoma City. "It's been a lot of independents like us that have found all this gas, developed the technology and made it happen."

Hefner attributes the proliferation of small natural gas companies to the fact that individual landowners generally retain the mineral rights to their own property. "In America, if [your] dream is to drill a well, you can go out and drill a well," Hefner points out. "As a result, there's been about three-and-a-half-million wells drilled in America over the years, versus about a million and a half for the rest of the world."

Mom-And-Pop Businesses

Many of those natural gas wells are mom-and-pop operations, or began that way. Often they evolve into slightly larger companies, but even the publicly traded companies are generally small. Those that survive in the energy world have learned to leverage their size.

U.S. Energy Consumption, By Fuel Type

Natural gas accounts for just 22 percent of the nation's energy consumption. Natural gas advocates say that increased use would mean a cleaner environment and less dependence on foreign oil.

A pie chart showing U.S. energy consumption

Notes

Percentages do not total 100.

"We certainly don't have an advantage when it comes to capital," says J. Russell Porter, chairman and chief executive of Gastar Exploration, a Houston-based company with just 23 employees. "The large companies can spend a lot more money than we can. But we can be very quick on the draw, if you will, to seize an opportunity and buy into a new concept or a new area that we think could be prospective for natural gas. If we do that, we usually have a first-mover advantage."

The agility of small companies is an important strength in a field where the ability to move fast is key to maintaining a competitive edge. But there is also a more practical reason small companies dominate the U.S. natural gas business. Typically, a new gas well produces in abundance in the year after it's opened, but then production begins to decline. If a natural gas company is to keep production and revenue steady, it has to keep drilling new wells. The energy majors may not have the patience for that effort.

"Big oil companies like big projects that they can manage over 30 and 40 years," says Nikos Tsafos, natural gas analyst at PFC Energy in Washington. "They prefer those over the project that you need to stay on top of every single day, every single month."

There's no dispute on that point from the oil majors. "With a company our size, we have to have a larger scale," says Patrick McGinn, spokesman for Exxon Mobil's exploration arm. "We have to have a potential resource that has more capability for us to go after."

More About The Quest For Shale

Modern Shale Gas Development In The United States: A Primer by the U.S. Department of Energy (PDF)

The American Clean Skies Foundation is a nonprofit devoted to educating the public about natural gas and its relation to renewable energy and energy efficiency.

The Ground Water Protection Council monitors regulation of natural gas drilling and production in the U.S.

Worldwatch Institute, an independent research group based in Washington, D.C., conducts research about energy and climate change.

Managing Innovation And Risk

The natural gas industry, in fact, serves as a case study demonstrating how business strategies vary according to a company's size. From small to large, energy companies manage innovation and risk in ways appropriate to their own circumstances.

Gastar Exploration, like many other natural gas companies, is currently focused on the Marcellus shale formation in the Appalachian basin, perhaps the most promising area for natural gas development in the United States today. But the company has so far limited its activity in the area to a few shallow wells in West Virginia, choosing to let a few larger gas companies take the lead in the area.

"We look at what they're doing," says Gastar CEO Porter. "[We] let them drill some of the early wells, try to determine which drilling techniques work the best, and then once they have done that trial and error and established a pattern that works, we can go in and design our wells without having that trial-and-error phase, which can be very expensive."

The challenge of managing risk is important in any new industrial venture. In the natural gas business, the smallest companies in some ways can be the most adventurous. The new investments they make are tiny compared with what a large company would make. But they will still try to shift as much of the risk to their rivals as they can, just as Gastar is doing.

A Magnet For Big Oil

Paradoxically, the biggest energy companies follow a similar strategy, though in their case they try to shift risk to their smaller rivals. Shale production in the United States looks so promising right now that the big oil companies are thinking about getting back into the natural gas business. Exxon, for example, is looking at some possible shale "plays" in the United States, but — like Gastar — the company is biding its time before making a big move.

"We've taken a couple of years to really work on the technology that's required to do the exploration and production of these kinds of shale plays," says spokesman McGinn. "Doing the homework and doing the technology development takes some time for us, and we are willing to wait for that."

The possibility of Exxon's entry into the U.S. shale gas business would have major implications for a "micro-cap" company like Gastar Exploration, but Porter, Gastar's CEO, is not overly concerned.

"We can live on the fringes if necessary," he says. Or Gastar could just let the big oil companies take over some of its gas operations — for the right price.

"If Exxon came in and wanted to become a dominant player in the Marcellus shale, I'm sure there are lots of small operators who would be willing to sell out to them if they were willing to pay full value," Porter says. "There's always going to be another play for us to go invest in and start creating value all over again."

It's all part of the natural gas business game.

If We Make It Through December

According to the following article in the "Calgary Herald", the production of "conventional gas" in Canada and the United States is declining rapidly because of a lack of drilling activity. This could lead to rising gas prices. The big question is whether this production shortfall can be met by increasing production of "unconventional" shale gas. It is going to be an interesting winter. With that in mind, here's an appropriate song by Merle Haggard. Click on the youtube link to hear it.
Peter

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-IJxTd8dCo

Mapping the path for natural gas

By Peter Tertzakian, Calgary HeraldSeptember 21, 2009
Peter Tertzakian (source)

No birthday party is complete without balloons. Beyond livening up the venue with ornamental colour, balloons are meant to be popped. Kids love the festivity and it's all in good fun. Also, balloons can be blown up, pinched tight at the stem, and then let go to rocket around the room in a spastic rush of air. That's fun too, until someone loses an eye as your mother may point out; or unless you think of it in terms of the natural gas business.

It hasn't been much of party watching shrinking natural gas sales and producing companies on the brink of bankruptcy, but in a twisted way the party may just be beginning.

Like watching an airborne balloon deflate, Canada's conventional natural gas production is declining rapidly. Just this year we've lost about 1.0 Bcf/d of production (not including production that's been shut in). Since peaking in 2006 at well over 16 Bcf/d, volumes are now down 16% or 2.5 Bcf/d. By now everyone should know that much of the incentive to drill for natural gas in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (nearly all in Alberta) has dried up due to high costs followed by low prices that have plagued the domestic industry for close to three years now. The dynamic is simple: if the rigs aren't out drilling at a certain pace, the physics of the rocks take over and natural gas reserves start declining. This dynamic is irrefutable and one of the few variables that the financial markets can count on as being predictable.

But Canada's situation is not unique. Production is now declining rapidly in high-cost, conventional geological regimes in the United States too. Back in August of 2008, the rig count in conventional US regions dropped precipitously from 800 to 200. That's when the fingers let go of the American balloon. The “blow down” hasn't been too noticeable up until now, because the aggressive growth of prolific, low-cost shale gas has been able to backfill what was being lost in the conventional regions. Behind the scenes it's been an almost seamless substitution of a high-cost product with a low-cost substitute, all facilitated by new technology applied on a large scale.

In fact, this gas-for-gas substitution is nothing new. Natural gas production from the US Gulf of Mexico has been on a steep decline since 2001, dropping from 14 Bcf/d back then down to about 7.0 Bcf/d this year. During that time period growing unconventional gas volumes from the onshore Barnett Shale in Texas backfilled the blow down in the Gulf almost one-for-one. But now shale gas regions have a challenge that is twice the size of the Gulf of Mexico: backfilling the 30 Bcf/d of conventional onshore production that's now declining by an estimated 17% per year.

The billion dollar question for 2010 is whether or not unconventional gas production in now-legendary plays like the Barnett, Haynesville, Fayetteville, Woodford, Marcellus and even Canada's Montney, to name a few, will be able to collectively respond fast enough to offset estimated conventional declines in 2010 of 5.0 Bcf/d in the US, plus another 1.0 Bcf/d in Canada. Theoretically it's possible, but nobody likes to talk theory at a party. Indeed, there are many practical constraints to boosting near term production including thin cash flows, stretched balance sheets, impatient bankers, tightened service industry capacity, and the strained logistics of mobilizing oilfield equipment once the price signals are convincing enough for E&P companies to spend money again.

In the long term, beyond 2010, shale gas and other large-scale unconventional gas plays will be increasingly dominant and able to offset conventional production declines. But that's the long term. Next year, it's quite possible that only half of the expected 6.0 Bcf/d of conventional losses in North America will be replenished. It's a scenario that speaks to benchmark continental prices rising above $US 6.00/MMBtu again, all else being equal.

This coming winter will be interesting. A mild combination of a colder-than-average temperatures, a gradual recovery in industrial demand and the gravitational pull of declining conventional production have a very good chance of collectively tightening up the oversupply that the natural gas industry has been living with for over a year. I give this near-term scenario at least even odds, and in part that's why natural gas prices have been rallying recently. After all, nobody wants to miss the party.


Tuesday, September 22, 2009

National Public Radio Wakes Up To The Benefits Of Natural Gas

It is good to see the traditionally liberal, left-leaning National Public Radio (NPR) doing a story about energy and the environment without beating the "dead horse" of man-caused global warming or climate change.

The following story about the role natural gas can play in helping to solve America's (and the world's) energy problems is one that dearly needs being heard far and wide.
Peter


Rediscovering Natural Gas By Hitting Rock Bottom

September 22, 2009

September 22, 2009

In recent years, natural gas producers in the United States have struggled, mostly in vain, to be taken more seriously in the energy world. Big oil companies like Exxon had concluded that natural gas reserves in the United States were not sufficiently abundant to warrant big investments in exploration and drilling. When small independent gas producers argued otherwise, they were often ridiculed.

"I once had to tell the Exxon people in front of a congressional committee that I respectfully disagreed with every single thing they had presented," recalls Robert Hefner, 74, a veteran gas producer from Oklahoma.

But the natural gas folks now have numbers on their side due to new successes in getting gas out of shale rock. Geologists have always known that shale rock, often found in combination with coal and oil deposits, holds substantial amounts of natural gas. If a piece of shale rock is broken and lit with a match, it will actually burn for a few moments with a small flame.

The shale gas was previously considered unreachable, but advances in drilling techniques have changed that assessment. The result is a dramatic increase in estimated natural gas reserves. The Potential Gas Committee, loosely affiliated with the Colorado School of Mines, reported in June that natural gas reserves in the United States are actually 35 percent higher than believed just two years ago, and some geologists say even that estimate is too conservative.

Drowning In Natural Gas

Vertical: A deep drilling rigt in Pennsylvania.
Enlarge Tom Gjelten/NPR

A deep drilling rig at the site of a shale rock formation in southwestern Pennsylvania. The rig, which was set up by Range Resources, a leading shale gas player, serves as a brace to support the drill.

Vertical: A deep drilling rigt in Pennsylvania.
Tom Gjelten/NPR

A deep drilling rig at the site of a shale rock formation in southwestern Pennsylvania. The rig, which was set up by Range Resources, a leading shale gas player, serves as a brace to support the drill.

"I used to say the nation is awash in natural gas," Hefner says. "Now I say we're drowning in it."

One area getting new attention is the Marcellus basin, a 400-million-year-old shale formation stretching from New York to West Virginia. That basin alone is believed to hold as much as 500 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, the equivalent of about 80 billion barrels of oil. (There are also large shale gas basins in Texas, Wyoming, Arkansas and Michigan.) It is not clear how much of the shale gas is recoverable, but the new production techniques have boosted all previous estimates.

Shale formations are deep underground — 6,000 feet or more — and the rock is relatively impermeable. Deep drilling is expensive, and in the past the amount of gas that could be reached was not considered sufficient to justify the cost.

Horizontal Drilling

In recent years, however, gas producers expanded the use of "horizontal" drilling. After boring more than a mile below the Earth's surface to reach the shale layer, a drill operator will slowly "steer" the drill bit to one side, until it is heading sideways across the shale layer, thus achieving access to more of the shale than a traditional vertical well could provide.

Vertical Image of a drilling platform on a shale gas rig.
Enlarge Tom Gjelten/NPR

The drilling platform on a shale gas drilling rig. The shaft in the center is turning a drill bit deep underground. The drilling operation continues 24/7.

Vertical Image of a drilling platform on a shale gas rig.
Tom Gjelten/NPR

The drilling platform on a shale gas drilling rig. The shaft in the center is turning a drill bit deep underground. The drilling operation continues 24/7.

Even so, the tightness of the shale rock would mean that relatively little of the trapped gas would seep into the pipeline. Gas producers therefore fracture the rock by forcing a water and sand mixture into the formation at very high pressure. This "water fracturing" technique opens millions of tiny cracks in the rock, enabling more of the gas to seep out.

Horizontal drilling and water fracturing are not new techniques in the oil and gas business, but only in recent years have producers used the procedures in combination to produce shale gas, and the results have been dramatic.

"It's the biggest thing I've ever even heard of," says Ray Walker, vice president of Range Resources, a gas exploration and production company. "It's huge. The ability to produce these shale reservoirs is going to revolutionize this industry all over the world."

Walker moved to Pennsylvania from Texas two years ago to direct his Fort Worth-based company's exploration of the Marcellus basin. Since then, Range Resources has dug more than 40 horizontal wells in Pennsylvania, and several dozen more are in preparation. In Texas, Wyoming and other areas, it's the same story.

Horizontal Drilling And Water Fracturing: The Keys To Shale Gas Production

Gas embedded in shale rock formations deep below the Earth's surface has long been considered inaccessible, due to high drilling costs. New horizontal drilling methods, combined with techniques to fracture the rock, have for the first time made shale gas production practical.

Credit: Tom Gjelten, Alyson Hurt and Avie Schneider/NPR

Spreading The Word

"[Shale gas] is the most important energy development since the discovery of oil," says Fred Julander, founder and chief executive of his own Denver-based gas company, Julander Energy.

But the word has not yet spread as far as gas advocates would like. Ian Cronshaw, the top gas analyst at the Paris-based International Energy Agency, highlighted the jump in estimated gas in his most recent energy outlook report, but noted that the news had gotten little notice. "If that had happened in the oil industry, it would be a headline item," Cronshaw said at a recent meeting in Washington. "But because it happened in gas, nobody seems to be paying any attention."

As an energy source, natural gas is cheaper than oil, and when burned it produces only about half the carbon dioxide that comes from burning coal. As long as natural gas reserves in the United States were believed to be nearing depletion, the fuel did not get much attention, but with the upward revision of estimated reserves, that has changed.

"Natural gas is the fuel that can change everything for our nation," says Robert Hefner, who lays out his case in a new book, The Grand Energy Transition. Hefner argues that a big boost in the use of natural gas would dramatically lower greenhouse gas emissions and reduce the U.S. dependence on foreign oil. Much of the nation's electrical power now generated by burning coal could instead come from natural gas, and a switch to natural gas-powered automobiles would produce dramatic results.

"If we were to convert half of our existing vehicle fleet [to natural gas], we would eliminate a little over half our oil imports," Hefner contends. He and other natural gas advocates have been supported in recent months by environmental organizations.

"There's a huge capacity of natural gas that is lying idle," says Timothy Wirth, a former Democratic senator from Colorado who now heads the United Nations Foundation. "That makes absolutely no sense at all when what we're trying to do is clean up the atmosphere."

A 'Transition' Fuel

Natural gas is still a fossil fuel, and when burned it does produce greenhouse gases. Environmentalists working for the use of renewable energy sources nonetheless see natural gas as a transition fuel. One idea is to build mini-power generating stations, each connected to the natural gas pipeline infrastructure. A station attached to a hospital or a shopping mall could produce heat as well as electrical power, cutting energy costs dramatically.

"You can combine that with improvements in end-use efficiency and the development of renewable energy sources, and really see these as a partnership," says Christopher Flavin, president of Worldwatch Institute, an environmental research organization.

"Even the International Energy Agency is saying the path for oil is downward, and suddenly we've got this very different picture for natural gas," says Flavin. "I think it's unfortunately not fully percolated into the understanding of what's possible among policymakers. But I think as that takes hold in the next few years, it's really going to change the game."