Saturday, August 22, 2009

Finally, The Gas Industry Is Fighting The Nonsense Of Man-Caused Climate Change

Finally industry if fighting back over the nonsense of man-caused global warming.
Peter

Gas Industry Girds to Fight in the Senate Over Climate

The U.S. natural-gas industry, disappointed by the climate-change bill passed by the House of Representatives in June, is counting on new Democratic allies and a stepped-up lobbying campaign to push measures through the Senate that will favor gas over coal and oil.

The climate-change debate in the Senate, which is expected to involve several committees after Labor Day, comes at a critical time for the gas industry. It faces a glut that has driven natural-gas prices below $3.20 per million British thermal units, their lowest level since 2002. In addition, huge new gas discoveries in Texas, Louisiana, Pennsylvania and elsewhere have produced a surge in supply.

The House bill, known as the American Clean Energy and Security Act, focuses on "clean coal" research rather than encouraging natural-gas use. Many in the gas industry concede they were caught off guard by both the coal industry's intensive lobbying campaign and the speed with which the House acted.

"We were not prepared for the pace at which the House legislation proceeded," says Jim Hackett, chairman and chief executive of gas producer Anadarko Petroleum Corp.

But Mr. Hackett says the industry won't repeat its mistake with the Senate. He and other CEOs have formed a new lobbying group, America's Natural Gas Alliance, and pledged about $80 million to the effort, which will include a national media campaign in the fall.

The alliance's members include more than two dozen of the top natural-gas producers in the U.S., including Chesapeake Energy Corp., XTO Energy Inc. and Devon Energy Corp.

David Trice, who is chairman of both the Alliance and gas producer Newfield Exploration Co., stepped down as Newfield's CEO in May in part to focus on the lobbying effort. He says he has met with 20 senators since the group was formed in March.

The gas-industry's goals in the Senate include incentives that will encourage power companies to switch to natural gas from coal and lead truck fleets to convert to natural gas from diesel. Lobbyists will also seek to limit companies' ability to atone for their pollution via carbon "offsets," such as planting trees overseas, which reduce the incentive to switch to cleaner fuels like gas.

At a recent conference on clean energy in Las Vegas, former Vice President Al Gore, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Energy Secretary Steven Chu all spoke positively about using more natural gas.

Following the conference, John Podesta, who co-led President Barack Obama's transition team last winter and who heads the liberal Center for American Progress, co-wrote a paper with former Colorado Sen. Tim Wirth advocating greater use of natural gas.

Environmental groups are also pushing the Senate to embrace natural gas as a "bridge fuel," which would allow the U.S. to move away from coal and oil faster than it could using renewable fuels alone.

"I think people are realizing that instead of gas being an afterthought, gas is a balance wheel of the new market," says Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, an environmental group.

But the gas industry must overcome major hurdles. Other energy producers are also mobilizing. A major theme of the coal industry has been the relatively stable price of coal compared with volatile natural-gas prices. Meanwhile, major natural-gas consumers, including chemical companies and many utilities, oppose increased use of natural gas because it could drive up costs.

Mr. Trice concedes that the industry was slow to recognize the need to persuade lawmakers that the U.S. can burn more gas without causing price spikes because of the new gas discoveries.

"We weren't up there telling them how things have changed over the last couple years," Mr. Trice says.

"It would've been nice if this organization existed a year ago," he adds. "But we're part of the debate today."

Write to Ben Casselman at ben.casselman@wsj.com

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A20

Friday, August 21, 2009

Is America Committing Economic Suicide?

I wonder how much of the information in the following article is true. Is America committing economic suicide by chasing "alternative energy" (solar, wind, biofuels, etc.) while demonizing the oil and gas industry? This is where the radical environmentalists and global warming alarmists have led us. It is way past time to turn this "ship of state" around, because we're headed in the wrong direction.
Peter

A rush for black gold in the Gulf

Examiner Editorial

August 20, 2009

Major new offshore drilling for oil and natural gas in the Gulf of Mexico will soon be a reality. The big question is whether Americans will be part of it. Brazil, China, India, Norway, Spain and Russia have all signed agreements with Cuba and the Bahamas to initiate exploration and production in the Gulf of Mexico within the next two years. So the prospect of seeing Russian oil rigs 45 miles off the Florida Keys -- where American oil companies are now forbidden to drill -- is a very real possibility.

The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that the eastern Gulf region contains 3 billion barrels of oil and more than 11 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Last summer, former President George W. Bush lifted the executive branch moratorium his father signed in 1990 on new drilling in 85 percent of America's territorial waters. The Democratic Congress then wisely let the congressional ban expire as well. So the only thing keeping U.S. firms from drilling off our own continental shelf is President Barack Obama and his secretary of the interior, Ken Salazar, who is slow-walking the approval process that must be cleared before the work can begin. Meanwhile, foreign nations are jockeying for the best spots. The Obama administration, incredibly enough, is giving Brazil a $2 billion loan from U.S. taxpayers to finance that nation's development of its own off-shore energy resources in the Atlantic.

According to the American Petroleum Institute, the development of America's coastal oil and gas resources would generate more than $1.3 trillion in new government revenue and 160,000 high-paying jobs over the next two decades. Senators Lisa Murkowski, R-Ark., and Mary Landrieu, D-La., are bipartisan co-sponsors of a bill that provides coastal states such as Florida their fair share of revenues produced by off-shore drilling and production. The same thing should be done for states on the East and West coasts. California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the state's lawmakers hope to tap deposits off Santa Barbara to generate billions in royalties, and Virginia's front-running gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell has made drilling 50 miles off that state's coast a key component of his energy plan.

Many environmental objections to deepwater drilling have been overcome. For example, 4-D seismic surveys provide pinpoint accuracy for well location. New technology also enables one drilling platform to reach deposits 40 miles away in water up to 10,000 feet deep (note the same technology could help other nations drill just outside our coastal limits while tapping into resources inside the boundary). According to the U.S. Minerals Management Service, less than 0.0001 percent of the 1.4 billion barrels of oil pumped offshore since 1980 has been spilled -- a remarkable safety record and a tribute to American energy ingenuity.

Find this article at:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/A-rush-for-black-gold-in-the-Gulf-8127872-53705292.html

Thursday, August 6, 2009

Chesapeake Energy And Haynesville Shale Gas Production

Chesapeake Energy is reporting some very significant production results from their Haynesville Shale Gas Play activity.
Peter

By OGJ editors (source)

HOUSTON, Aug. 3 – Chesapeake Energy Corp. expects to hike its Haynesville shale gas output to a gross operated 575 MMcfe/d at the end of 2009 and as much as 1.025 bcfe/d by the end of 2010.

The production rate in late July was 175 MMcfe/d net and 285 MMcfe/d gross operated.

The company plans to average 33 operated rigs in the second half of 2009 and 36 rigs in 2010 compared with 29 currently active.

Chesapeake has added 40,000 net acres since Mar. 31, 2009, and is now the play’s largest leasehold owner at 510,000 net acres. Plains Exploration & Production Co., Houston, Chesapeake’s 20% joint venture partner, owns another 113,000 net acres.

The two companies have drilled and completed 74 Chesapeake-operated horizontal wells.

Assuming a flat Nymex gas price of $7/Mcf for the life of the well, Chesapeake estimated pretax rates of return from a 6.5 bcfe horizontal Haynesville well drilled for $7.5 million of 42% excluding the benefit of drilling carries and more than 345% including carries.

Chesapeake recovered 35% of its $4.7 billion Haynesville leasehold investment with the sale of a 20% interest to Plains, bringing Chesapeake’s net investment in Haynesville leasehold to $6,000/net acre.

Three second quarter completions achieved pipeline-constrained initial 30-day average production of 15.3, 14.2, and 15.2 MMcfe/d. The three wells are in Caddo and De Soto parishes, La.

For a far more thorough discussion of Chesapeake's production activity, see the following article:

http://www.chk.com/News/Articles/Pages/1314522.aspx

The following is a brief summary:

Company Reports 2009 Second Quarter Production of 2.453 Bcfe per Day, an Increase of 4% over 2009 First Quarter Production and 5% over 2008 Second Quarter Production

Company Increases Proved Natural Gas and Oil Reserves by 0.7 Tcfe to 12.5 Tcfe, Anticipates Reporting 2009 Second Quarter Drilling and Net Acquisition Costs of Less Than $1.00 per Mcfe; Company Record Set for Organic Reserve Additions and Reserve Replacement Over a Six-Month Period; Year-End Proved Reserve Targets for 2009 and 2010 Reaffirmed at 14 and 16 Tcfe, Respectively

Monday, July 27, 2009

Exxon, Rubber Balls And Frac Treatments

Exxon/Mobil claims to have developed a new technique of continual, sequential hydraulic fracturing of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in long "horizontal" wellbores. The method allows one frac stage to be immediately sealed off by pumping "rubber balls" into the well immediately following the frac fluid and proppant. They then move up the hole and duplicate the process on the next zone. This allows them to frac and complete an entire well in a couple of days compared to what might take as long as a month using conventional technology.

Clearly Exxon/Mobil expects this technology to spread or they would not have publicized it. The cost-saving and production enhancing implications are significant. This development warrants watching. The article is by Elizabeth Souder/Dallas Morning News (source)
Peter

Exxon sees natural gas potential with new drilling technique

By Elizabeth Souder/ The Dallas Morning News (source)
03:23 PM CDT on Sunday, July 26, 2009

By ELIZABETH SOUDER / The Dallas Morning News
esouder@dallasnews.com (source)

RIFLE, Colo. – Dozens of workers mill around a jumble of pipes and whirring equipment surrounding 10 natural gas wells operated by Exxon Mobil Corp.






New technologies make natural gas drilling more efficient (DMN - Photography/Editing: Courtney Perry)
07/15/2009

At this well site in the desert, 80 miles west of the Rocky Mountains tourism hive, the men load cranes, operate pumps and monitor little red lines on computer screens. The work must happen simultaneously, in a carefully orchestrated ballet, to keep the well costs low – and profit high enough – to be worth the effort of the country's largest oil company.

"We're about 15 minutes away from a new frac being born," Randy Tolman, Exxon's project coordinator for the Piceance Basin, shouts over the noise. He invented this faster method of fracturing, or "fracing," the underground layers of rock and sand to unlock natural gas.

Exxon aims to export the new process to the unconventional natural gas reserves it is accumulating around the world. Drilling for more natural gas could make Exxon a lot of money as Americans demand cleaner fuel because natural gas doesn't emit as much pollution or greenhouse gases as oil and coal when burned.

"It's the bridge fuel," said Amy Jaffe, associate director of Rice University's energy program, adding: "It's going to be a 20-year bridge."

Exxon forecasts that natural gas demand will rise 50 percent by 2030 and outstrip demand for coal.

"Clearly, we anticipate that natural gas will grow much faster than oil or coal. So we see a pretty healthy demand out there in the future for natural gas globally, but even here in North America," chief executive Rex Tillerson said during an analyst meeting earlier this year.

At the gas well site in the desert, Exxon has drilled 10 holes, five of which already produce natural gas. The company's rigs in the Piceance (pronounced PEE-awns) Basin don't have to be reassembled between wells. Instead, the drill can move horizontally and laterally to reposition. This speeds the process and cuts the cost of rig crews.

As with many so-called unconventional natural gas fields in the U.S. and around the world, simply drilling a well here won't produce much gas. Operators must fracture the underground rock or sand around the well to allow more gas to flow out.

"This is a very complex reservoir, one of the most complex I've worked on in my 33 years," said Jim Branch, project executive with Exxon Mobil Production Co.

From months to weeks

In the 1980s, frac jobs could take months. Now a complicated frac typically takes a couple of weeks. Exxon's Tolman developed a method to fracture a Piceance Basin well in three days, and he thinks he can compress it to 24 hours.

The key is to conduct every activity simultaneously. Everybody thought that was impossible until Tolman persuaded his colleagues to experiment.

While working on a natural gas well in La Barge, Wyo., in the 1980s, Tolman noticed something strange. Natural gas was flowing out of the well without pushing out or damaging the wire that operators had dropped into the well.

Years later, while descending an elevator at Exxon's corporate building in Houston, Tolman had an idea. Why not use this phenomenon to perform simultaneous functions on a well? That's exactly what he is doing at the site in Colorado.

Plenty of other natural gas producers operate wells in the Piceance Basin, but Exxon controls the sweet spot on land owned by the Bureau of Land Management.

The company has been producing small amounts of natural gas in the basin since the 1950s, with interests on 300,000 acres, holding enough gas to heat 50 million homes for a decade.

Exxon began a significant expansion here in 2007, after scientists developed drilling and fracing methods that could make the operations profitable. Exxon now operates seven rigs in the Piceance Basin and produces 100 million cubic feet a day. Project executive Branch said the company could eventually increase to 1 billion cubic feet a day.

Long-term outlook

The current lull in natural gas prices won't deter him.

"We're taking a long-term view," Branch said, repeating Exxon's mantra. He won't say whether the operations are profitable, with natural gas future prices trading below $4 per thousand cubic feet. Last summer, prices rose above $13.

Chief executive Tillerson said he's not specifically aiming to become more of a natural gas company than an oil company. Right now, Exxon's production is split about evenly between the two, and the company's strategy is to simply pursue the best projects each year.

"We don't have a deliberate strategy to change the oil-gas mix," Tillerson said during a news conference after the company's annual meeting earlier this year.

Analysts say a shift is evident and necessary.

Exxon's total natural gas sales have declined four out of the past five years, dropping 1.5 percent in 2008 to 10,812 million cubic feet per day. Production dropped 3 percent last year, although the company produced more natural gas than it discovered.

"By the time Exxon shifts, it will take three to five years before you see anything that's noticeable," said Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Fadel Gheit. "There is no instant gratification in anything they do."

The company has announced adding a number of unconventional resources to its books during the last few years, including fields in Germany, Eastern Europe, Canada and the Marcellus shale in the Northeast U.S.

"The future of unconventional shale gas, there's a pretty bright future," Tillerson said after the annual meeting. He said he's considering other fields as well, where Exxon can use its strategy of getting in cheaply, holding the resources for a long time and applying fresh technology.

Many of Exxon's new fields are shales, similar to the Barnett Shale in North Texas, where Exxon had a joint venture but sold out. The Piceance Basin isn't shale but sand. The company hasn't tried the new technology on shale reserves, and officials won't say where, exactly, they will try the process next.

"We haven't done it yet" on shales, Tolman said. "But I think there's a great opportunity."

Frac central

At the desert well site, workers wearing fireproof jumpsuits and hard hats in the summer heat have positioned the wire in the well. The frac water is flowing, and the pressure is building.

The frac specialists inside a (mercifully) air-conditioned trailer – some of them Halliburton employees working on a contract for Exxon – prepare to shoot electronic pulses from the wire.

The men watch colorful computer screens to monitor pressure created by pumping a mixture of sand, water and chemicals into the well. When the pressure is just right, they shoot the frac gun, then drop rubber balls into the well to plug the frac holes, and immediately repeat the process.

"Nineteen hundred until ball drop," says Ron Campbell, an Exxon workover superintendent manning one of the computers in the trailer. He's talking to the outdoor crews over a radio while staring at screens that monitor well pressure and tension on the wire lines.

Five other workers inside the trailer check computer monitors and scour instruction booklets. Scattered around the desk are bottles of water and Gatorade, a hard hat, a calculator and a half-eaten bag of Uncle Bob's Party Mix.

The red line on one of the screens rises. Over the radio, somebody says: "Shot is fired."

The red line wiggles as the rubber balls reach their holes and pressure inside the well builds.

"The frac is being a little bit fussy," Tolman says.

The men will fire the frac gun seven times today. While one gun is shooting the first well, they will load the second gun for well No. 2, back and forth, so that the men and the equipment are constantly working.

The natural gas will go through a treatment facility for cleaning, then into the U.S. pipeline system, bound for home cooktops, power plants and chemical facilities across the nation.

Most energy experts agree that demand for natural gas will surely rise if a bill to cut greenhouse gas emissions becomes law. The bill passed the House and awaits consideration by the Senate.

Renewable fuel sources can serve only a sliver of U.S. demand. Until more wind farms and solar arrays can be installed, Americans would have to rely on natural gas to comply with the new regulations. Natural gas emits less of the greenhouse gases thought to cause climate change than coal.

And, thanks to new drilling technologies, the U.S. has plenty of natural gas to meet the rules. According to the Energy Information Association, proved U.S. natural gas reserves in 2007, the most recent data, have risen by one-third to 237,726 billion cubic feet since 2002, just as the new techniques were becoming popular.

In fact, most experts agree that new technology, such as the Exxon process, offers the only hope of immediately meeting the greenhouse gas emissions goals outlined in the bill.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Natural Gas Powered Vehicles Make Sense

It makes sense to convert existing vehicles and build new ones to burn compressed natural gas rather than gasoline and diesel fuel derived from petroleum (crude oil). If the government sweetens the deal with large tax credits, as they are proposing, so much the better.

Will this solve our energy "problems" and stop "climate change"? No. Will it create jobs, increase tax revenue, and decrease our dependence on foreign oil? Yes, most definitely. Go for it, Democrats and Republicans. Vote for it.
Peter

Big Tax Breaks for Natural Gas Vehicles in New Senate Bill
WASHINGTON, DC, July 10, 2009 (ENS) - A bill that allows a tax credit of up to $12,500 for the purchase of a natural gas-fueled vehicle was introduced in the U.S. Senate this week.

The bipartisan legislation, S. 1408, would extend and increase tax credits for natural gas vehicles and refueling. It is sponsored by Senator Robert Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat, with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and Senator Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican as original co-sponsors.

Said Menendez, "We saw last summer how the wild fluctuations in oil prices helped to wreck our economy and we’ve seen how pollutants from dirty fuels are wrecking our planet. Our economic crisis has shined a spotlight on the urgent need for alternative, cleaner and cheaper sources of energy that we don’t have to import. By making it easier and cheaper to own a vehicle that runs on natural gas, we can help families save money on energy, create new manufacturing jobs and clean our air."

"Because of new extraction techniques," Menendez told reporters, "We now have 35 percent more accessible natural gas than we did two years ago."

The bill, known as the NAT GAS Act, extends for 10 years the alternative fuel credits for natural gas used as a vehicle fuel, the purchase of natural gas-fueled vehicle, and the installation of natural gas vehicle refueling property credit.

"Each day, our nation consumes about 21 million barrels of oil - more than 25 percent of the world’s oil supply," said Senator Reid. "Nearly 70 percent is imported from outside our borders. With only three percent of the world’s oil reserves, we cannot produce our way to a safe and secure energy future. I’m proud to join with Senators Menendez and Hatch in introducing legislation that will help encourage the development of natural gas vehicles to help save consumers and operators thousands of dollars per year, protect our environment, and decrease our dependence on foreign energy."

Burning natural gas produces far less air pollution than burning gasoline. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, cars running on natural gas cut overall toxic emissions by at least 93 percent compared to gasoline.

"We must get serious about using cleaner burning natural gas and renewable energy, and this legislation is a strong step in the right direction," said Reid.

T. Boone Pickens listens as Senator Orrin Hatch tells reporters why he supports tax credits to spur the use of natural gas. (Photo courtesy Office of the Senator)

Natural gas is an abundant resource, with 98 percent of natural gas used in the United States originating in North America, a key reason for his support of this bill, said Senator Hatch.

"Natural gas is an important alternative fuel to help pave the way to energy independence, which will not only help keep us safer, but will also help reduce the high cost of fuel and, thus, high utility bills across the board," Hatch said.

"In our current economic downturn, it’s crucial to provide appropriate incentives that lead to lower prices for all Americans," he said. This piece of legislation does just that while also helping clean up our environment; I am a proud cosponsor."

Billionaire T. Boone Pickens, who drove his CNG-fueled Honda GX Civic to the news conference introducing the bill on Wednesday, said, "This bipartisan legislation does more to reduce our foreign oil dependency crisis than any other piece of legislation in the past 40 years. As I have said many times before and will continue to say, natural gas is cleaner, cheaper, it’s abundant and it’s American."

"This bill will accelerate the use of natural gas in vehicles and is the only way I know to quickly and effectively reduce our dependence on foreign oil," Pickens said. "For too long, our dependence on foreign oil has been one of the factors influencing our foreign policy and if we can eliminate that issue by using our own domestic natural gas resources I am confident that it will benefit our national security, our economy and the environment."

Pickens stands to benefit from passage of the legislation. The company he founded, Clean Energy Fuels Corp., owns and operates natural gas fueling stations from British Columbia to the Mexican border.

The largest provider of natural gas for transportation in North America, on June 30, Clean Energy opened the world’s largest natural gas truck fueling station on a site adjacent to the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles. Natural gas has the ability to displace 100 percent of the petroleum currently used in heavy-duty vehicles, according to the EPA.

If the bill becomes law, it would increase the refueling property tax credit from $50,000 to $100,000 per station, a provision from which Pickens' company would benefit.

The state of Utah also stands to benefit from this legislation. Americans use more than 22 trillion cubic feet of natural gas per year. There are an estimated 350 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in Utah and surrounding states. Currently, natural gas for vehicles sells for 88 cents per gallon in Utah, and at least 5,000 Utah drivers fuel their cars and trucks with natural gas.

In February, Utah Governor Jon Huntsman announced plans to increase the state’s natural gas vehicle fueling infrastructure and in his State of the State address designated Interstate 15 (I-15) from Idaho to Arizona as a natural gas vehicle corridor.

Demand for natural gas as a vehicle fuel has quadrupled during 2008, Huntsman's office says. Today, the state of Utah and the utility Questar Gas own and operate 25 natural gas fueling stations that are open to the public.

The legislation S. 1408:

  • Allows the natural gas vehicle and natural gas fueling infrastructure credits to be transferred by the taxpayer back to the seller or to the lessor
  • Allows state and local governmental entities to issue tax exempt bonds to finance natural gas vehicle projects.
  • Allows 100 percent of the cost of a natural gas vehicle manufacturing facility that is placed in service before January 1, 2015 to be expensed and to be treated as a deduction in the taxable year in which the facility was placed in service. This decreases to 50 percent after December 31, 2014 and is phased out by January 1, 2020.
  • Requires that when complying with mandatory federal fleet alternative fuel vehicle purchase requirements, federal agencies shall purchase dedicated alternative fuel vehicles unless the agency can show that alternative fuel is unavailable or that purchasing such vehicles would be impractical.
  • Provides for grants for light-duty and heavy-duty natural gas engine development.

Copyright Environment News Service, ENS, 2009. All rights reserved.

Good News For Gas Producers

This is very good news for producers of natural gas in America and Canada. Natural gas can be compressed (CNG) and used in conventional internal combustion engines with very little modification. It appears the United States and Canada have abundant supplies of natural gas, especially considering the relatively recent discovery of how to produce gas from common organic rich shale, or so-called Shale Gas.

There is no doubt that finding and developing more of this gas will create American jobs, increase tax revenue, decrease our dependence upon foreign sources of oil and be a good thing for our economy in general. The technology and infrastructure to accomplish all of this is in place, ready to go.

Many examples of these Shale Gas Plays are exhibited on this blog. Some of these shales include the Barnett, Haynesville, Fayetteville, Marcellus, and the Woodford. These articles can be found on this blog through the search function.
Peter

Natural-Gas Vehicles Gain Senate Backing; Gas-Price Jump Seen



By Siobhan Hughes, Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- A plan to encourage more natural-gas vehicles in the U.S. got a new push on Wednesday, as the top Democrat in the Senate backed legislation to provide tax breaks and other incentives for the vehicles.

But underscoring the trade-offs involved in turning the U.S. away from oil as a transportation fuel, one of the plan's biggest backers said that it would cause gas prices to double from current levels. That could be a problem for households that use gas to heat their homes or gas-fired power plants, though fueling vehicles would remain relatively inexpensive.

"Will it bring the price up?" billionaire energy investor T. Boone Pickens said in a response to a question at a press conference on Capitol Hill. "It will probably." He estimated that prices would rise to about $7 per thousand cubic feet, compared with prices that would translate into about $3.46 per thousand cubic feet in recent trading.

Pickens joined two senators at a press conference to promote the legislation, which is also backed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. The plan would extend tax breaks for buying natural-gas vehicles, provide grants to develop light- and heavy-duty gas engines, and provide incentives to build refueling stations. Besides turning away from foreign oil, the goal is to turn to a fuel that produces fewer greenhouse-gas emissions.

"Natural gas is not the ultimate solution at ending our dependence on foreign oil," said Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., one of the sponsors. "But natural-gas vehicles must be part of the solution as well, because With new extraction techniques we now have 35% more accessible natural gas than we did two years ago."

The plan has been promoted for at least a year by Pickens and a fellow gas man, Chesapeake Energy Corp. (CHK) Chief Executive Aubrey McClendon. The two got a boost last year, when Rahm Emanuel, who at the time was a lawmaker in the U.S. House of Representatives and now serves as chief of staff to U.S. President Barack Obama, introduced a natural-gas vehicle bill. Though the full measure never became law, it helped elevate the topic within the highest levels of the U.S. Congress.

Behind the push is the discovery of vast new amounts of gas locked up in rock formations -- known as shale -- around the U.S. The gas fields in Texas, Louisiana and Pennsylvania led the nonprofit Potential Gas Committee to announce that the U.S. has 2,074 trillion cubic feet of natural gas still in the ground, or nearly a century's worth of production at current rates. That is up 35% from the previous estimate in 2007.

For drilling in those regions to be truly economic, prices would need to rise. At $7, Pickens estimated that the cost of refueling a natural-gas vehicle would still be cheaper than using conventional gasoline, as a thousand cubic feet of gas contains the same amount of energy as eight gallons of gas, which would cost between $20 and $24 at current prices.

Gas would also be cleaner: Cars that run on compressed natural gas generate 25% fewer carbon-dioxide emissions than cars that run on conventional gasoline, according to an earlier U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimate.

Separately, Pickens denied a report that he was scaling back a plan to build the world's biggest wind farm to five or six smaller farms. Speaking to reporters after the press conference, he said "I didn't cancel it." He said " it's going to be delayed about a year or two."

-By Siobhan Hughes, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6654; Siobhan.Hughes@ dowjones.com

Sunday, July 19, 2009

Natural Gas-Powered Vehicles....A Good Thing

Bill in US Congress to Boost Natural Gas Vehicles

2 April 2009

US Congressman Dan Boren (D-OK-02), Democratic Caucus Chairman John Larson (D-CT-01), Congressman John Sullivan (R-OK-01) have introduced a bill to expand the use of natural gas as an alternative to conventional transportation fuel.

Provisions of the New Alternative Transportation to Give Americans Solutions Act, or NAT GAS Act (H.R. 1835) include:

  • An 18-year extension of three critical tax incentives that focus on natural gas as a transportation fuel, the purchase of natural gas-fueled vehicles (NGVs), and the installation of commercial and residential natural gas refueling pumps.

    Currently, the alternative fuel credit expires at the end of 2009, and the vehicle and refueling pump credits expire at the end of 2010. The legislation would also modify the current tax credits to provide even greater incentive for state and municipal fleet managers to buy natural gas vehicles and engines.

  • A new tax credit for auto manufacturers that produce natural gas and bi-fuel vehicles.

  • A requirement that by the end of 2014 at least 50% of the new vehicles purchased and placed into service by the federal government to be capable of operating on compressed or liquid natural gas.

  • Grants for light and heavy-duty natural gas vehicle and engine development.