Showing posts with label Devon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Devon. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Optimistic Future For Oil And Gas Drilling And Production In Ohio

Let's keep a close eye on what is going on in Ohio as this development takes place.  I must caution however, beware of the hype.  Salespeople have been known to exaggerate the value of products they are selling.
Peter

            
New map showing revised gas-oil drilling prospects in Ohio creates stir

By Bob Downing
Beacon Journal staff writer





A relatively simple multi-colored map is creating a buzz in eastern Ohio.
Some counties’ residents are ecstatic at the possibility they might be sitting atop lucrative deposits of natural gas/oil products. Others are dismayed to learn smaller volumes of gas and oil might lie deep under their feet than previously estimated.

At the center of what’s happening is a newly released map from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources’ Division of Geological Survey. It shows excellent drilling potential under much of Stark County. Large tracts of Tuscarawas, Coshocton and Trumbull counties also rate excellent. So, too, does eastern Portage County.
Larry Wickstrom, one of four men involved in developing the map, says he is a little flabbergasted by all the attention it is getting.

The map is “just the addition of new information ... and fine-tuning what we have,” he said. It is merely the state’s best guess as to what might be found thousands of feet underground.
Areas outside the main development area could still be productive, he advised, and the map probably will change as state geologists get even more information.

The map, relying on new data, shows a slightly different footprint in eastern Ohio for Utica shale, identifying a core area for drilling that covers 10.8 million acres from Ashtabula County south into Guernsey County.

Much of the drilling in Ohio has been located in Carroll, Harrison, Columbiana and Jefferson counties. Those four counties generally rate good to very good, according to the new data.
Summit, Medina, Wayne and Portage counties are all in the good area. Most of Cuyahoga, Lake and Lorain counties are now excluded.

The map was unveiled to little fanfare in March at a statewide meeting of the Ohio Oil and Gas Association and has gotten increasing attention as word of its existence has spread. It is based largely on the level of hydrocarbons found in Utica shale cores the state owns.

Over the years, more than 40,000 wells have been drilled through the Utica shale to deeper formations. The state has stored those core samples at Alum Creek State Park near Delaware.
Occasionally, researchers would sample the cores. Then about three years ago, the samples started generating increased interest from drilling companies.

Companies took core samples to have them analyzed in their labs. Because they paid for the studies, the companies were allowed to keep their research private for a year before giving the data to the state.

As the information began trickling in, state geologists took the new data and began revising its maps.
To date, energy companies have drilled 60 horizontal wells into the Utica shale in Ohio, and a total of 194 permits have received state approval. That total includes 10 permits in Stark, six in Portage and one in Medina counties.

State officials have predicted that more than 2,250 wells could be drilled in Ohio by the end of 2015.
One big question that remains unanswered is whether there is enough pressure in the western part of the Utica shale formation, where it is thinner, to send oil up well shafts, Wickstrom said.
Most of the drilling companies have not begun to prospect the potentially oil-rich area that generally lies west of Interstate 77.

The exception is Oklahoma-based Devon Energy Corp., which has applied for state permits for wells in Medina, Ashland and Knox counties. The company has said it is more interested in Ohio’s oil than its natural gas.

Chesapeake Energy Corp. is the No. 1 player in Ohio and is attracted by the so-called wet gases: ethane, butane and propane that are found in Utica shale. That makes Ohio financially attractive at a time when natural gas prices remain very low.

Records show landowners can get signing bonuses of up to $5,800 an acre plus royalties as high as 21 percent on what’s produced by wells. The average leasing bonus in Ohio is about $2,500 an acre.

Bob Downing can be reached at 330-996-3745 or bdowning@thebeaconjournal.com.

Friday, December 4, 2009

Shale Gas: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch

Whoever coined the phrase about having to sacrifice for your lunch could have been talking about energy. You name the source of energy and look into it and you'll find there are pros and cons about every one of them. We have been deluged with negative information about big bad oil companies and dirty, filthy coal. Now we're hearing about all this natural gas we can produce from shale rock in many places around the country (USA) and the world. What is the real story?

The following article is a good introduction to shale gas and how it has the potential, or even probability of changing America's energy picture. Why isn't the mainstream media paying more attention? Why are we bombarded with pictures and stories of how windmills and solar panels are the answer to our energy needs? I think the answer is in the forces that have been behind the great scandal going on over the myth of man-caused global warming. For more information on that subject, go here.
Peter


An energy answer in the shale below?
New technology opens vast stores of natural gas, and the land rush is on

By Steven Mufson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, December 3, 2009 (source)

The first time Chesapeake Energy tried to buy mineral rights from Diana Whitmore, a 74-year-old retired real estate broker in southern New York, it offered her $125 for every acre of land plus a 12 percent royalty on whatever natural gas it extracts.

Nearly two years later, she's still holding out. Along with hundreds of other landowners, she has joined a coalition that is negotiating with nine oil and gas companies. The latest offers in the area are running as high as $5,500 an acre with 20 percent royalties.

"It's what's really going to turn this whole place around," said her son Daniel Fitzsimmons, who has since helped form the Binghamton Conklin Gas Lease Coalition.

This corner of the state is at the forefront of an old-fashioned land rush that has implications far beyond Conklin, N.Y. Oil and gas companies are vying to stake out territory where they can tap natural gas trapped in shale rock. Just a few years ago, the industry didn't have the technology to unlock these reserves. But thanks to advances in horizontal drilling and methods of fracturing rock with high-pressure blasts of water, sand and chemicals, vast gas reserves in the United States are suddenly within reach.

As a result, said BP chief executive Tony Hayward, "the picture has changed dramatically."

"The United States is sitting on over 100 years of gas supply at the current rates of consumption," he said. Because natural gas emits half the greenhouse gases of coal, he added, that "provides the United States with a unique opportunity to address concerns about energy security and climate change."

Recoverable U.S. gas reserves could now be bigger than the immense gas reserves of Russia, some experts say. The Marcellus shale formation, stretching across swaths of Pennsylvania, New York and West Virginia, has enough gas to meet the entire nation's needs for at least 14 years, according to an estimate by two Pennsylvania State University experts. Just in Broome County, N.Y., where Fitzsimmons lives, shale gas development could create $15 billion in economic activity, according to consultants hired by the county.

The country is carpeted with shale gas plays, including the Barnett in Texas, Fayetteville in Arkansas and Haynesville in Louisiana. Since 2000, gas from shale has grown from less than 1 percent of the nation's production to about 10 percent, according to the consulting firm PFC Energy, and it's picking up fast.

That's changing the energy and economic landscape from Broome County to the Gulf of Mexico. It could mean lower prices and reassurance to homeowners who heat with gas, or towns and companies with vehicle fleets running on the fuel. As winter begins, the price of natural gas is about a third of the level it was 14 months ago. Storage facilities are bursting.

With new supplies, the country will be less vulnerable to disruptions from Gulf Coast hurricanes and need to rely less on imports. Already, deliveries of liquefied natural gas from places such as Qatar, Nigeria and Trinidad are down 58 percent in 2008, idling costly U.S. terminals.

The prospect of new gas supplies at stable prices is also transforming debates over climate change. It deals another blow to proposals for new coal plants. And because gas plants can be switched on and off quickly, unlike coal and nuclear, natural gas could supplement wind and solar power facilities, whose output varies with the weather.

"Natural gas can serve as a bridge fuel to a low-carbon, sustainable energy future," said former Colorado senator Timothy Wirth, now head of the U.N. Foundation. Indeed, this year, coal use is down about 13 percent, while electricity demand has fallen only 5 percent and natural gas use has remained about steady.

But the prospect of widespread shale gas drilling is also driving wedges in the environmental community. Many environmentalists have sounded alarms about the chemicals that drillers use to fracture the rock and the danger of natural gas or other substances contaminating water supplies. A video posted on the Web shows a man in Fort Lupton, Colo., lighting a fire with the tapwater in his kitchen sink -- although it isn't clear what caused that problem.

Residents of New York City, which draws drinking supplies from a large watershed that reaches up to the Catskill Mountains, have protested, and Chesapeake Energy has voluntarily announced that it would not drill in the watershed. Gov. David A. Paterson (D) has declared a moratorium on drilling until the state's Department of Environmental Conservation issues rules, which are open for public comment. A raucous meeting in Manhattan last month ended before even a third of the people who wanted to comment got a chance to speak.

"This is probably the biggest thing to happen to the state of New York since the initial clearing by settlers," said Wes Gillingham, executive director of the Catskill Mountainkeeper.

In north Texas, some people are also wondering whether drilling in the Barnett shale is to blame for a series of barely perceptible but highly unusual earthquakes now being investigated by geologists.

Yet other environmental groups favor developing gas to displace coal. "There are legitimate concerns that need to be addressed," said Bruce Nilles, a lawyer at the Sierra Club. But, he added, new natural gas supplies could be a "game-changer" in the battle against coal plants.

Nilles said New York's 20 coal plants largely burn Appalachian coal from areas with mountaintop removal. "The status quo means continuing to destroy the oldest mountain range in the country," he said.

Credit for discovering that gas could be economically extracted from shale generally goes to George Mitchell, former head of Mitchell Energy. In the early 1980s, as the company's production was declining, Mitchell and his geologists started experimenting with "hydraulic fracturing" -- blasting underground layers of shale with a mixture of water, chemicals and sand to crack the rock and get gas flowing out of it.

"Mitchell had hired an investment banking firm in 1999 to see if anyone wanted to buy them," recalled Larry Nichols, chief executive of Devon Energy. "Devon and everyone else looked and said, 'No, that technology doesn't work.' We, like everyone else, turned up our noses."

Three years later, Devon paid $3.1 billion to acquire Mitchell. It combined hydraulic fracturing with horizontal drilling, which enabled a single well to turn, follow a seam of shale for up to two miles and produce much more gas. Now a quarter of the natural gas produced by Devon, a $30 billion company, comes from shale.

Historically, most of the natural gas produced in the United States came from relatively small pockets in porous rock. The oil and gas industry has been "eternally searching for relatively small traps," Nichols said. Shale, by contrast, is widespread and hard to miss. "Devon has drilled 4,000 wells in the Barnett and is planning 4,000 more, at least. And we have not drilled a dry hole," Nichols said.

The stakes are high for companies and consumers, as well as the environment. Shale gas has already added billions of dollars to the value of companies like Devon, but it unsettles people living in scenic portions of Pennsylvania and New York, which were the first places oil was discovered but which have been relatively undisturbed for decades.

Some people are just happy about the money. Fitzsimmons, for example, suffers from arthritis and has a nonverbal autistic 18-year-old son. He and his family own 185 acres. "If you're a property owner, it's amazing," he said. "Even some of the ones who are members of these organizations that are supposedly against it -- when it comes time to get a check on their property, suddenly they're all for getting the check."

Thursday, April 2, 2009

What Happens When Taxes Are Raised On Industry?

In this case the industry is the oil and gas industry. The Obama Administration, and unfortunately many in Congress and the American people, have been led to believe that the oil and gas industry is an untapped gold mine. They seem to think they can reap Billions of dollars of revenue from the industry by simply raising taxes. This kind of thinking has dire unintended consequences which need to be addressed.

One obvious consequence is these taxes, these added costs to the industry, will be passed on to consumers, meaning higher prices of oil and gas for you and I. So the tax is essentially an added tax to us taxpayers. Is this really good for our economy?

Also, by increasing taxes on the oil and gas industry, and further hobbling them by limiting areas where they can explore for oil and gas, the consequence is a shortage of oil and gas, leading to higher prices and an even larger dependence on foreign sources of oil and gas. How is this good for the U.S. economy? How will it create jobs? The oil and gas industry should be encouraged, not discouraged.

Few people outside of the oil and gas industry understand the enormous cost and risk involved in exploring for and producing oil and gas. The industry is unique, I think, in that regard. Our government, by failing to understand the basic economic principle of risk vs. reward, does immeasurable harm to the industry, the economy, and American people.

The fact is, the risk (and cost) of exploration and production is so great that if the "reward" is removed, companies and investors will not take the necessary risk. Who suffers, who pays when this happens? Everyone, consumers, taxpayers, and ultimately the government itself. The following article in the Fort Worth (Texas) Star Telegram summarized the situation.
Peter

Obama's proposed tax increase would stifle drilling, energy executive says
By JACK Z. SMITHjzsmith@star-telegram.com (source)

President Barack Obama’s proposed tax increases of more than $80 billion on the U.S. oil and gas industry over 10 years would crimp drilling activity and lead to higher energy prices for consumers, the CEO of the largest operator in the Barnett Shale said Tuesday.

Larry Nichols, head of Devon Energy and chairman of the American Petroleum Institute, said the higher taxes would reduce oil and gas companies’ cash flow, resulting in less money to drill wells. That would tighten supplies and raise prices, he said at a Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce luncheon.

"The strange thing is, they don’t realize the consequences," Nichols said, referring to Obama administration officials pushing for the increased taxes, which the petroleum institute estimates would cost the industry $84.4 billion.

Profits as 'gold bars’
In Washington, Nichols said, energy companies’ profits are considered "gold bars in the back room that we don’t know what to do with," rather than as a vital source of cash for drilling wells and creating jobs.

Supporters of the proposed tax increases counter, however, that they are equivalent to only a small part of energy companies’ revenue and profit. They stress that a single company, Irving-based Exxon Mobil, made a record after-tax profit of about $45 billion last year, an amount totaling more than half the proposed tax increases over a decade.
But energy companies’ fortunes have plunged this year as a result of a huge drop in oil and gas prices.

As a result, Nichols said, there has been an exceptionally rapid decline in drilling activity in recent months. Natural gas drilling in the Barnett Shale, while still substantial, has diminished to less than half its peak level. That’s setting the stage for a decline in production and a doubling of gas prices, Nichols said.

Offshore drilling
Nichols lamented the prohibition of offshore drilling off most of the U.S. coast, which he said have "really awesome oil and gas reserves." Soaring energy consumption in fast-growing developing nations such as China and India means that the world is "going to need more oil, and we’re doing to need more natural gas," he said.

More immediately, however, the industry is absorbed in staving off the proposed tax increases, Nichols said, putting the industry’s chances at "50-50."

Friday, March 13, 2009

There Is Light At The End Of The Tunnel

Gas prices and drilling and production of natural gas will continue to increase. Now is the time to prepare. So says a VP for Devon Energy Corp. and reported in the following article from the Oil & Gas Journal. This is good news for the shale gas plays and horizontal drilling and interpretation.
Peter



GPA09: Gas recovery coming sooner, not later
Warren R. True
Chief Technology Editor-LNG/Gas Processing

SAN ANTONIO, Mar. 10 -- Rapidly declining US natural gas rig counts and prices are setting the stage for a recovery in both sooner rather than later. That was the message today of Gregory A. Dodd, vice-president for natural gas marketing and supply at Devon Energy Corp. in remarks to the 88th Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association in San Antonio.

Dodd sees signs of this eventuality in the rapid pace that gas rigs are being laid down or otherwise pulled away from US gas plays, especially shale areas. He also said many wells are being completed but not yet tied into gathering and transmission infrastructure.

Today's fuel
The coming recovery is evident in the accelerating rate of production decline, the increased use of natural gas in electric power generation as falling prices make it more of the fuel of choice, and the inevitable US economic recovery. Devon, said Dodd, is "getting ready for a turnaround" by, in part, increasing its 2009 capital budget over 2008.

Natural gas, Dodd said, is "not the fuel of the future but the fuel of today." Companies need to be prepared for recovery by reducing debt and reorganizing management structures to speed decision making.

They also need to shorten response times for rig mobilization once recovery begins and be actively influencing policy making, especially at the federal level. Currently, said Dodd, the story of natural gas is not getting told in Washington, DC.

LNG will play a critical role, he said, in meeting demand in the recovery, as it will take US production companies 6 months from the time rigs are called back to work and increased production from that new work.

Contact Warren R. True at warrent@ogjonline.com.